The affronting question of viability: when you know but you don’t want to look

‘Viable’ is a powerful word because of its unflinching nature.

 A course of action that will succeed, or not.

When I work with businesses or CEOs, I try to draw a line between where a business is currently (A), and where it wants to be down the line (B). And then to ponder the link between A and B and test for whether that path can work.

A few patterns that I’ve noticed:

  • There is too much positivity bias in play
  • Assumptions are generally under-interrogated
  • The path is assumed to be linear but it never is
  • CEOs know of this unviability but tend to ignore it

In my experience, 75% of a business’ assumed pathways are unviable. 

It’s not that they can’t be viable (there are an infinite number of approaches to getting a business to succeed) but because the above patterns play out, businesses end up with a hit-and-hope approach.

I understand the CEO’s need to convince themselves of their business’ viability, sometimes which involves avoiding truths. Equally, I understand that the CEO has more than enough to do without having to contemplate these existential questions. 

My point is this: Is there any question more important than considering your business’ viability?

I would argue not. This is the central responsibility of a CEO. 

Furthermore, I would argue that the work a CEO does within a business is infinitely more effective, more enjoyable, and more vital with a viable business path in front of them.

I work with CEO’s to form a ‘Success Hypothesis’ that is a very effective way to defeat the damaging patterns I outlined above and to get to viability. If you feel like the viability of your business is in question, reach out – I’d be happy to kick the tires. 

rowan@lockstep.global

You May Also Be interested In

Engage with Lockstep

Found this article insightful? Contact Lockstep today to assist your business with world-class leadership solutions.